Search This Blog

All photographs on this blog are taken by J. E. Stephens (author) unless stated otherwise.

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

Wikipedia

Wikipedia - a great first point of reference. But I don't believe it should ever be used as a source in any research paper. This is not necessarily because the information is untrustworthy - mostly I find it quite reliable - but because it is constantly changing. How can you quote a piece of information if it might not be there in the future?

4 comments:

  1. That's true and since the references are provided on the main Wikipedia article page, it makes sense to follow on to the original source and reference that. I had no idea that simple English Wikipedia existed, but this certainly makes me more open to the idea of letting students go to Wikipedia as a starting point for information.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with you Jenny, and I think this is the core issue. We need to teach students to extract the information and to go to the "real" source, if only to keep the information somewhat more constant than the ever-changing wikipedia.

    ReplyDelete
  3. That's an excellent point Jenny, and something I never considered before.

    ReplyDelete
  4. One piece of advice - it is worth including a 'date accessed' with anything you reference in Wikipedia (and for that matter, on other websites).

    ReplyDelete